MASANUMASIKA GARBHINI PARICHARYA: MONTH-WISE ANTENATAL REGIMEN AND ITS RELEVANCE TO FETAL GROWTH — A NARRATIVE REVIEW
Background: Low birth weight, fetal growth restriction and preterm birth remain major causes of neonatal mortality and lifelong morbidity in South Asia. Maternal nutrition, stress and physical activity during pregnancy are modifiable determinants of fetal growth. Ayurveda prescribes a month-by-month regimen for the pregnant woman (Masanumasika garbhini paricharya), centred on milk, ghee and sweet, nourishing drugs, together with conduct and mental well-being, and towards term, medicated enemas and vaginal tampons. Objective: To describe the classical month-wise regimen, relate it to the classical account of month-wise fetal development, and examine how far its components are supported by current evidence on maternal nutrition, lifestyle and fetal growth. Methods: Charaka Samhita, Sushruta Samhita and Ashtanga Hridaya were reviewed for the month-wise regimen and fetal development. PubMed was searched for Ayurvedic antenatal studies and for systematic reviews on maternal micronutrient and dairy intake, prenatal yoga and antenatal perineal massage. Findings were synthesised narratively. Results: The classical regimen matches nutritional support to the described stages of fetal development, with liquid, cooling foods in early pregnancy, progressively richer milk and ghee preparations in mid-pregnancy, and preparation of the birth canal in the eighth and ninth months. Several components have modern analogues with good evidence: prenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation increases birth weight and reduces small-for-gestational-age births, maternal dairy intake is associated with higher birth weight, prenatal yoga reduces anxiety and labour duration, and antenatal perineal massage reduces perineal trauma. No controlled trial has tested the complete Ayurvedic regimen, and Ayurvedic evidence is limited to small trials and case reports. Conclusion: Masanumasika garbhini paricharya is a coherent, low-cost framework consistent with current understanding of maternal nutrition and fetal growth. It should complement, not replace, evidence-based antenatal care, and pragmatic trials with birth weight and fetal growth outcomes are needed.